裁判官彭亮廷裁決有違常理錯晒喎！三項控罪發還裁判法院交由另一位裁判官重新審理 - Magistrate Norton Pang Plainly Wrong ReTrial Ordered 香港特別行政區 訴 黃子偉 (28/01/2026, HCMA143/2024) [2026] HKCFI 640

裁判官彭亮廷裁決有違常理錯晒喎！三項控罪發還裁判法院交由另一位裁判官重新審理 - Magistrate Norton Pang Plainly Wrong ReTrial Ordered 香港特別行政區 訴 黃子偉 (28/01/2026, HCMA143/2024) [2026] HKCFI 640 (https://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=176790&currpage=T)


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cheung Yan & Associates Solicitor Desmond Cheung Sued By Other Lawyers 張德民律師俾法律界行家告 - HCA2413/2018 - Next Hearing on 16 March 2026 (60 Minutes Reserved)

Cheung Yan & Associates Solicitor Desmond Cheung Sued By Other Lawyers 張德民律師俾法律界行家告 - HCA2413/2018 - Next Hearing on 16 March 2026 (60 Minutes Reserved) -  https://hongkonglawyer2025.blogspot.com/2025/12/solicitor-desmond-cheung-sued-by-other-hongkonglawyers.html “3.  In this action, serious allegations are made by the plaintiffs against the 1st defendant, including unauthorised transfers out of client account to the 1st defendant’s personal accounts from 2008 to 2016. The plaintiffs also allege that in June 2016, the 1st defendant signed 172 bills which were falsified and were never sent to the clients and that based on these bills, cheques were drawn on the client account and eventually transferred to the 1st defendant. Lastly, there is also an allegation that the 1st defendant played a part in certain secret profit-sharing arrangement involving other defendants and that was in breach of his duty to the firm.”  https://legalref.judiciary.hk/ lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.j...
Read more

K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized by the Hong Kong Court of Appeal in [2018] HKCA 210 周啟邦律師事務所俾香港高等法院上訴庭鬧

K B Chau & Co Solicitors Criticized by the Hong Kong Court of Appeal in [2018] HKCA 210  周啟邦律師事務所俾香港高等法院上訴庭鬧  -  https://kbchausolicitorscritizied.blogspot.com/2018/06/k-b-chau-co-solicitors-criticized-by-the-hong-kong-court-of-appeal.html http://legalref.judiciary.hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp?DIS=114747&currpage=T 62.  After the conclusion of the hearing, and  without seeking leave of the court or the consent of the plaintiffs, William’s solicitors made further submissions by letter  with proposals of directions from this court to the judge.   This is highly unsatisfactory  and such practice has been rightly  deprecated  in a number of decisions, including To Pui Kui v Ng Kwok Piu & Ors, CACV 281/2012, 21 August 2014, at §§55 to 61.  Mr Chua did not seek an adjournment of the hearing to deal with any further point he might wish to address, nor did he give any indication at the hearing he needed to do further resea...
Read more

謝啟聰律師行俾法庭喪鬧 Bobby Tse Solicitors Criticized By Court - 關錦萍 訴 唐安麒美顏創造中心(國際)有限公司 [2025] HKDC 540

謝啟聰律師行俾法庭喪鬧 Bobby Tse Solicitors Criticized By Court - 關錦萍 訴 唐安麒美顏創造中心(國際)有限公司 [2025] HKDC 540 - Bobby Tse & Co Solicitors seemed to have forgotten that as officers of the Court, their paramount duty to assist the Court overrode their client’s instructions. Bickering is childish, unbecoming and unhelpful -  https://legalref.judiciary. hk/lrs/common/ju/ju_frame.jsp? DIS=167342&currpage=T  Rede Chambers Barrister Michael Yin Convicted Criminal 殷志明大律師係罪犯 HCMA 28/2015  http://hkremembers. blogspot.com/2015/06/lawyer- counsel-barrister-michael-yin- of-sir-oswald-cheungs- chambers-still-guilty.html?m=1 Barrister George Chu Misconduct Convicted 朱奉慈大律師專業失當罪成  http://www.scmp.com/article/ 307891/barrister-barred- deceiving-university  / 方也方大律師被釘牌- Barrister Candy Fong Misconduct Convicted (For Being Rude)  https://www.gld.gov.hk/ egazette/pdf/20081222/ egn200812223579.pdf  / Barrister C Y Li SC Absurd 李秋源資深大律師陳詞荒謬 - CWG v MH [2014] 1 HKLRD 838 (§16)...
Read more